Another month ticks away. Holiday stuff looms. It’s generally the first of the month when I notice time passing, and December and January are right up there for noticing it (along with birthdays). The clock ticks inexorably on, and I find myself wondering where the last week / month / year / decade went.
But enough of the philosophizing. Today’s links aren’t the freshest, since I didn’t find anything interesting this morning, but what the heck. I’ve still got some links piled up from earlier in the week, including a fairly long rant.
A friend pointed me to Software Engineering for Internet Applications, a book that’s online. This is one of those very frustrating books for me. I’m pretty sure there’s some good stuff in there that I’d like to read–for that matter, the introduction had me stopping to ponder for a half-hour. But the problem is that I think there are faulty assumptions out of the gate. An example from the introduction:
Amazon is the best known example. In 1995 there were dozens of online bookstores with comprehensive catalogs. Amazon had a catalog but, with its reader review facility, Amazon also had a mechanism for users to communicate with each other. Thus did the programmers at Amazon crush their competition.
Well, no. There may have been dozens of online bookstores with comprehensive catalogs, but I sure couldn’t find them back then. I remember Amazon, Powell’s, Stacey’s, and Computer Literacy being the bookstores I shopped online. Computer Literacy became Fatbrain, which got swallowed by Barnes and Noble. Powell’s is still out there, but isn’t quite comprehensive. Stacey’s has closed up a couple locations, and is nothing like comprehensive anymore.
All along, Amazon was the most comprehensive, and simplest to use. It also had the best item descriptions, and not from users, but editorial descriptions. At amazon, there was a good way to put in an ISBN and get taken straight to the book. Most of the other stores obscured that behind some big ugly web application. And finally, while I often use isbn.nu for my online book shopping, because you can put in an ISBN and get the cheapest price, I frequently end up going to Amazon to see more about the item, and then discover that while Amazon may not have the cheapest price on any one book I want, if I order two or three books, Amazon has all of them, and I save enough on shipping by buying them all from the same place to make up for the fact that they’re not the cheapest place.
So I think the three big factors for Amazon were a comprehensive selection; good, non-user-generated descriptions of things; cheap prices, even if they’re not the absolute cheapest; and a simple interface that always worked on my Mac, which other bookstores often failed at. The user reviews are nice, but they’re not what brings me back there.
So anyway, back to the book, I find it awfully hard to decide to spend time reading a book like this one when right out of the gate I find something that just isn’t true in my experience. It’s not the community. It’s the not-sucking that matters.
- A Loophole would let messages penetrate Do Not Call list, and it’s being proposed by the FTC, who are supposed to be protecting us from phone-spam. Give them a piece of your mind if you think this is a bad plan, but do so before January 10, 2005. [slashdot]
- Groklaw has posted The 1994 USL-Regents of UCal Settlement Agreement which was formerly secret. This has some bearing on USL’s claims that various people owe them money. It also seems to mean that all the BSDs are in the clear. [slashdot]
- Don’t think I want TiVo Their Way: Ads, Copy Brakes. Bleh. These changes aren’t going to kill TiVo, but I don’t think they’re heading in the right direction, and I’m not looking forward to the
upgrade
in March. Then again, my year with DirecTV will be up, and cancelling will be an option. [wired] - In Back to the Baroque Glenn Reynolds reviews Neal Stephenson’s three book Baroque Cycle. I’m thinking of buying them now that they’re all out. My worry is that I’ve heard from people and from the review that these are not fast-moving books, and I worry about getting pulled into nearly twenty-seven-hundred pages of reading when I don’t really have the time for that sort of thing. [instapundit]